Back Country Horsemen team up with Wilderness Society

Photo

By Andrea Imler on November 12, 2009 - 7:30pm

Aldo Leopold, co-founder of The Wilderness Society and a preeminent voice in the conservation world defined wilderness as “a continuous stretch of country preserved in its natural state, open to lawful hunting and fishing, big enough to absorb a two week’s [horse] pack trip.” In his most famous book, A Sand County Almanac, he provided two examples of “primitive skills in pioneering travel…”one of these is canoe travel, and the other is travel by packtrain.”

Share the Story

A Horse Rides Through It

The Wilderness Society honors the rich history of horseback riding in wilderness through a new partnership with Back Country Horsemen of America.

The two groups first met in the spring of 2009 when Back Country Horsemen of America approached The Wilderness Society to request their help preserving opportunities to enjoy wilderness riding and packing and interpreting the history and significance of pack and saddle stock for managers and other wilderness advocates.

“A partnership between the Back Country Horsemen of America and The Wilderness Society makes sense, especially in light of how many of our visionary wilderness leaders, like Aldo Leopold, Howard Zahniser and Mardy Murie, saw many of their greatest moments of clarity, insight and inspiration while riding a horse deep into the wild country of America,” said Bart Koehler, senior wilderness campaigns director at The Wilderness Society. “These moments gave them a bedrock solid sense of direction and helped them lead the way to securing protections for special wild places thanks to The Wilderness Act.”

The two groups hope to educate public lands agencies and the recreating public about the historical and traditional use of horses and pack stock on public lands and to increase the substantive and ideological support for maintenance of this use. This includes working to influence the FY2011 federal budget to include more funds for trail maintenance on Forest Service lands and joint scoping comments regarding management of newly designated wilderness areas.

“When the Wilderness Act was being debated in Congress, horsemen were among the advocates who testified for its passage. None of us imagined that later generations might question our privilege to enjoy that resource,” said Mike Reedy, past Chairman of Back Country Horsemen of America. “But that’s the situation we find ourselves in more and more often. The Wilderness Act passed because of broad citizen support and it is our hope that horsemen will be welcomed by more wilderness advocacy groups as partners in the continued support and enjoyment of wilderness.”

The Wilderness Society’s history is founded on a deep acknowledgement of and personal connection to pack and saddle use in wilderness. Due to recent agency management and policy decisions, some horse users feel unfairly and unnecessarily excluded from wilderness. This is not consistent with both organizations’ joint history and the two groups are working to reduce the real and perceived instances of unjustified limitations.

“The Wilderness Society believes that pack and saddle is a historical, appropriate, and accepted use of wilderness,” said Scott Brennan, Northern Rockies forest program director for The Wilderness Society and participant in The Wilderness Society and Back Country Horsemen of America meetings. “Direct personal experience is what inspires people to care for wild places, and recreation, including pack and saddle stock use, is by far the most important source of such inspiration. This is why we seek to make common cause with Back Country Horsemen of America,” he said.

The Wilderness Society is looking forward to working with Back Country Horsemen of America. “It’s pretty exciting to have the opportunity to work together. I’m looking forward to the progress we can create,” said Cynthia Wilkerson, Washington state program manager and participant in The Wilderness Society and Back Country Horsemen of America meetings.

photo: Two women riding horses in wilderness. Photo by Damon Parrish, Courtesy of REI.

Tags: Back Country Horsemen, Back Country Horsemen of America, outdoor recreation, partnership, the wilderness act, Stewardship, Wilderness

Comments

horses in the Wilderness

I was first a backpacker and still am, but I am also a horse owner who loves to ride my horse on the backcountry trails. I ride my horse as lightly loaded as possible with the gear I use for backpacking and seldom take a pack horse. I am well aware of how some backpackers regard me with hostility so I try and minimize my impact and always thank them for moving out of the way. I'm sorry they are so offended by horse poop!

Most of the negative comments about horses in the Wilderness are referring to commercial packing operations; and I agree that they are often over-the-top high impact and not always very courteous even to other non-commercial riders. Maybe it's time to look into their right to use the Wilderness for profit. That being said, they to allow individuals who would never hike into the Wilderness the opportunity to experience it in relative comfort--maybe too much comfort!

Michelle Schmitke, DVM, member BCH of Washington State

The irony of loving pack trains and opposing bicycling

I hope you'll indulge a separate comment. I didn't want to make the previous one too long.

Perhaps someone from the Wilderness Society will shed light on what seems to be a supreme irony. The article says that the Wilderness Society "hope[s] to educate public lands agencies and the recreating public about the historical and traditional use of horses and pack stock on public lands and to increase the substantive and ideological support for maintenance of this use."

It's well known that horses and packtrains tear up trails, denude areas around campsites, attract flies, and litter routes with continual piles of droppings that others have to walk through, mile after mile. I assume they also disrupt stream habitats, trample vegetation, annoy wildlife under some circumstances, and cause other problems. Horses aren't even native to North America, if I recall correctly; they're an exotic invasive species. Why is the Wilderness Society so enthusiastic about perpetuating the impact on Wilderness of large nonindigenous mammals, while at the same time so adamant about opposing (as I assume it does) much more environmentally benign things like snow-kites, hunters' game carts, mountain bikes, and even federal agency wheelbarrows? The Wilderness Society's apparent enthusiasm for the agencies' mountain biking prohibition seems particularly peculiar, even in absolute terms but especially in light of its embrace of horse and packstock operations. Where's the environmental congruity in this?

I've pulled some commercial pack outfitters' trip descriptions off the Internet in the last few years and would like to quote from them so people get a sense of how far removed some trips appear to be from the Wilderness visionaries' idea of self-reliant and rugged travel, ideally accomplished under one's own power. (Some of these materials are now missing from the Internet, while others could still be found the last time I checked.):

• “Travel from yesteryear, luxury from today. A trusty horse will be your companion for the duration of your roving pack trip. . . . [¶] You’ll sleep under the stars at the confluence of luxury and wilderness. All guests stay in spacious high-grade waterproof tents with feather beds and pillows. And as for dining, our experienced cooks turn a rain fly and propane into a buzzing professional kitchen that rivals most big-city restaurants. The results? Exquisite cuisine you’ll remember almost better than the scenery.”

• “By virtue of the Wilderness Act of 1964 this area has been set aside as a place where the only possible means of transportation within are by foot or upon a horse. . . . [¶] . . . This is the land of many famous Mountain Men and many Indian tribes—an America[n] past. But, unlike its predecessors, you’ll enjoy the Wilderness in near luxury; clean, dry, spacious tents, warm soft sleeping bags, hearty and varied campfire cooking . . . .”

• “[T]he camp is very comfortable. Hearty mountain cooking is prepared at the camp’s cook tent and enjoyed in the adjoining lining tent or around the campfire. Sleep in roomy guest tents supplied with a wood burning stove for heat, and cots and pads. Or grab your sleeping bag and sleep under the stars. [¶] This is the perfect way to enjoy the backcountry wilderness without the hardships of backpacking.”

Wilderness Society-large mammal enthusiast alliance

I noted with interest this quotation in the article: " 'None of us imagined that later generations might question our privilege to enjoy [Wilderness],' said Mike Reedy, past Chairman of Back Country Horsemen of America. 'But that’s the situation we find ourselves in more and more often.' "

Here's an example of why some might question the desirability of horse and packstock use in Wilderness, particularly commercial operations that ferry people around in luxury. An Idaho backpacker wrote this (the source will follow):

"My trip to Stanley Hot Springs was full of surprises. This was my first trip into the Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness, which was the 1st Wilderness Area designated in Idaho and one of the first of the entire United States. It lies directly north of the massive Frank Church River of No Return Wilderness, and is separated from the Frank by only one road, the Magruder Road.

"We broke camp at Wilderness Gateway Campground at 4am in an effort to beat the heat. We were unfortunate to arrive during a week-long heat wave of mid-90s to 100+ temperatures. The last part of the hike down to Rock Creek was rough. There was little water, the trail was thrashed and loaded with horse poop due to extreme outfitter activity—in many places it was like hiking up jagged stairs. And, horse traffic on the trail proved cumbersome as the heat ratcheted up.

"Horses have the right-of-way here, so every time they are encountered backpackers and hikers have to get off the trail, approx. 5-6 feet below the horses and crush beautiful foliage as a result while the horses pass and kick rocks and dirt all over the party below. This makes for slow going, and if you have heavy backpacks on can really suck. We had to do it 4 times. Some of the outfitters were actually upset at having to deal with us backpackers, I think it was because our dogs spooked their horses and one of them spilled their beer. All in this particular party were drinking beer and smoking cigars while on the trail."

Source: http://www.idahohotsprings.com/destinations/stanley/index.htm

shared trails

Shared trails - yes, traveling atop large mammals is a recreation now in these United States. You would not have the life you live now if it were not for the settlers that went West across this wonderful country in such a short time with the help of large animals. West of the Mississippi, your hertiage would have been from Asian discent. Oh, yes, not capitalism but communism would reign.
Ok, now let us find some solutions to shared trails. I live in Ohio, we have more horses here per square mile then any other state. Most of our State parks offer bridle trails. We also have some shared paths, but do not have the great spans of Wilderness due to industrial and farm use. Our congested state feeds and supplies several wilderness states with everyday living necessaties, but for the most part, bridle trail use in Ohio gives recreationists a little taste of the wilderness. My horse club, Ohio Horse Council ,includes members from every Ohio county, and we are the caregivers to most of Ohio's bridle trails.
We also have wonderful hiking trails in Ohio, i.e. Hocking Hills. Please give some thought to shared use trails, you might discover some just answers; all U.S. citizens have and deserve the same freedom to enjoy this GREAT LAND.