Bush's Final Days Demand Vigilance

November 6, 2008 By

Mountain biker. Photo by wordcat57, Courtesy of Flickr.

It feels like we are entering a new era for protecting America’s wild rivers, snow-capped mountains, canyon country, and other wilderness lands. It is about time.

In the final days of any administration in Washington, both good and bad ideas are pushed through. In the case of the current administration, the ideas that have surfaced on environmental issues are stomach-turning. This administration plans to make use of their remaining 75 days, with several anti-conservation initiatives, policies, and schemes they aim to put in place before leaving office. We are keeping our eyes on them, and we’ve got to make sure that we show how thoroughly the public strongly disagrees with these last-minute actions that could damage our wild lands and wildlife.

Here are a few things to watch out for:

  • An attempt to weaken recent victories over snowmobiles at Yellowstone
    A court ruling required the Park Service to develop a temporary plan for this winter to make sure the public can visit Yellowstone while protecting its air, quiet, and wildlife. While the recently released plan starts to move in a positive direction, the proposed number of snowmobiles is still excessive and damaging.
     
  • Off-road vehicle abuse and unyielding energy development in Utah Canyon Country
    Imagine a starry night in the middle of the red rock canyon country of southern Utah. It is perhaps one of the most unique American wilderness experiences. Rather than protecting the wilds of Utah, the Bureau of Land Management is prioritizing energy development and off-road vehicle use on nearly 5 million acres that the agency found to have wilderness character. This plan is just a nod to the oil and gas and off-road vehicle industries with no regard for wildlands that Americans may want to share with future generations. We need to fight to stop these plans from being implemented.
     
  • Concealed weapons in our National Parks and Wildlife Refuges?
    This controversial new rule proposed by the Bush Administration would overturn a long-standing, functional and respected firearm policy that prohibits loaded, assembled firearms on public lands to prevent poaching and protect cultural resources and visitors. The recent proposal would unnecessarily negatively alter the culture of our national icons.
     
  • Excluding the public in mountain bike trail planning
    The Bush Administration is pushing to change regulations that would eliminate the public from designating mountain biking trails inside national parks. This means two things: 1) even mountain bikers won’t have a say in new trails and 2) trails could cut through areas that should be considered for Wilderness designation. This is an unnecessary policy change as this Administration prepares to leave.
     

So, please get ready to write some comments and send a clear message to the next administration that we need it to right-the-wrong on these bad last-minute decisions.

Tags: BLM, Bush administration, guns in parks, Idaho, Montana, mountain biking, Park Service, Utah, Wyoming

Legacy Comments

Guns in Parks

As an unarmed Federal Park Ranger who works for the US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), largest federal provider of recreation, who enforces part III of Title 36 (the NPS and USFS enforce parts I and II) you would think I would be against guns on public lands. The truth is the people that give us trouble on public lands are not the legal law abiding licensed concealed handgun carrier. It is the individual that will carry it regardless of whether it is legal or not is who causes the problems. Frankly with the fewer and fewer park rangers that all agencies are dealing with and the USACE's poor attemp at protecting it's visitors I don't blame people for wanted to carry concealed weapons as long as they are licensed. The real issue that the public should be bashing Bush for is for not providing adequate staffs to mange these public lands that we all cherish. The USACE, "The Silent Federal Recreation Provider" who hosts more visitors than the NPS and the USFS, Park Ranger does not have arrest authority and carries no weapons but yet enforces similar regulations as the NPS and USFS and deals daily with the same types of visitors you see on all public lands. USACE managed lands can be very dangerous even though it’s Park Rangers do an outstanding job when you consider they have very limited tools. If you really think about it that is scarier than licensed people carrying concealed weapons.

guns in parks

There are too many nutjobs running amok including in parks. One armed law abiding citizen may save lives or at least prtevent crime if the criminal oriented individual does not know who is armed. The life he saves might be yours.

Nutjobs in our parks?

I was unaware of the problem of armed 'nutjobs' running amok in our national parks and wildlands. Clearly the answer to this is to just hand out guns to everyone so that we can have mutually assured destruction.
Seriously though, do you people really believe that more guns will make us safer? This is preposterous, maybe we should give Iraq and Saudi Arabia nuclear weapons too so that they can prevent Iran from doing something with theres. Where does this line of "logic" end?
Plus, we are talking about National freaking Parks here, this isn't Compton or Watts. Get real, your biggest threat is posion ivy or maybe an angry bobcat. Banning all guns from Nat'l Parks is not going to send a message to criminals that Parks are a great place for crime. What are they going to steal anyway, your dinged up nalgene? Or maybe they will hold you up for the remnants of your bag of GORP.
The only nutjobs we have to worry about are the people who bring guns everyone anxiously awaiting their opportunity to be a hero.

I really don't think when a

I really don't think when a man takes his family camping or on a trip he is bringing his gun along to be a hero.
I feel much better knowing if someone comes into my home/tent/motel room my husband will be able to protect my family.
Gun's are not the problem......PEOPLE are!!!.
We have taught the children to think killing is fun look at the games they play the shows they watch & then Ask yourself what have we taught the Children.....there will always be a creep with a gun.........will we be able to protect ourselves from him?
I am not a gun owner, I have a horrible temper & would NEVER own a gun, because I know I would use it and maybe hurt some kid that screwed up. But I do feel better knowing My husband has a gun and is very skilled & has a very calm temper. He should be able to protect us if need be and If I cant scare the intruder away with my CRAZY temper.....
Quit fighting over guns and get the children of America back on track...they NEED us...........

Good point

Guns aren't the problem, video games are.
rolls eyes

It seems that most people are

It seems that most people are unaware of poaching and "pot-shooting." Not shooting for the pot, but the "sport" of shooting anything vulnerable. I've found dead swans and other birds, illegally shot bear remains, and once not far from my home, 5 deer head-shot in a refuge wherein NO shooting except for "waterfowl in season" is allowed. The fact that the deer were shot generally between the eyes pointed to their having been caught by lightbars/headlights, blinded, just as those you see standing in the road when you drive at night.
Such occurrences are profoundly important reasons why no guns should be allowed within any area where it is possible to ban them. People without guns do not shoot, but the bison and many other animals are gone because guns DO shoot, with people living without meaning or recognition of our relationship and dependence on the world and its diversity, pulling their triggers.
Iraq, the corruption of power, and video games, are the same to humans divorced from knowledge of our relationship with other life. Such a species and culture will either self-correct through your own recognition and enlightenment of others, OR will overbloom into a catastrophic fall; either way, hopefully very soon.

Bicycles and horses

No one should complain about bicycles on trails without first complaining about horses and mules. Horses' steel shoes tear up everything including stone. Their odor of their urine and manure can be overpowering. No one like to step in their manure, and it attracts flies and allows them to lay eggs and breed in it. Their bodies serve as blood sources for mosquitoes and horseflies which greatly increases their numbers. They eat vegetation, stir up dust, and make noise from walking.

The innocuous-seeming photo

The innocuous-seeming photo of a mountain biker may lead you to think of this wheeled vehicle as "eco-friendly."
Here in steep gulches, rich riparian growth, and high rainfall, a single bicycle off-road wipes out young growth for an entire season, causing erosion gullies.
Every wheeled vehicle pushes out forest duff, squashes the natural steps that deer, humans, and other animals make following paths not horizontal. This causes an artificial erosion gully to form. Over and over, one sees this.
The rushing rainfall water, instead of being caught and slowed by tiny plants, fallen leaves and needles, and pooled in those stepped paths, rushes down to the once-clear stream, silting up the salmon redds, choking off the eggs. Sturgeon, other anadromous fish, and other creatures are all vulnerable to this erosion.
On low, flatter paths, once wheeled vehicles destroy the surface plants, mudholes form, which following wheeled vehicles (and human hikers) avoid by stepping around. Once-narrow grassy paths in lowland forests (of which there are few left, humans taking all the land and paving, building, getting-rich-quick over "owning.") become ever-widening mudholes. The orv users pack chainsaws and chop their ways into these former animal paths, and the monstrous noise and havoc changes such areas irrevocably.
Bicyclists should get back on their feet and impact the land less. While ignorantly, blissfully cruising through a forest, unaware that life is also underfoot (or wheel). Important life, which needs care and respect. Leave the bikes on the roads.

The ignorance, prejudicial

The ignorance, prejudicial and bigoted viewpoint of the above statement is beyond reproach. There is no reason to respond directly to this person who obviously has their mind made up before any reasonable discussion. Why do I get the feeling this person would ban running from trails also ? It obviously causes "more resource" damage than hiking. Why are you running anyway, what are you running from? This person has the same attitude toward the bike....so the athleticism as a part of nature and the expanded consciousness given therein they will never get....
For relatively sedate people it is hard for them to see beyond their myopic view.
As a person that has been a conservationist for many years as well as an avid hiker, trail runner, mountain biker and equestrian I hope to have a fair appreciation of all sides of this issue.
Anyway, for the more rational conservationist I submit:
Trails building and subsequent use should match usages for a given terrain.
For instance, most people that are actually involved in maintaining and building trails in our pristine areas like myself ; that have build trails that have one trail for horses and one for bikes have seen the enormous damage inflicted by the horses own weight while the mountain bike open trails have remained relatively unchanged, yet horses are allowed in wilderness....
So build or designate a trail correctly on the type of terrain for the intended user groups and the problem is mostly solved. Doing such things as matching harder rockier terrain for equestrians and grading a trail properly; as the major resource damage to trails is water erosion which with one big big rainfall, can do more damage than any of the aforementioned user groups.
So non-bigoted sanity should prevail in understanding the correct use of our wonderful resources.
Sincerely,
Gim
20 year member:
Wilderness Society, Nature Conservancy, Sierra Club, Green Peace, National Parks and Conservation Association.
http://wilderness.org
http://www.nature.org
http://www.sierraclub.org
http://www.greenpeace.org
http://www.npca.org