Oregon’s Ancient Forests: The window to protect them is closing

Photo

By Andrea Imler on June 12, 2009 - 4:01pm

Peg Reagan, former Curry County commissioner, smiles as she talks about her daily commute. It’s not everyone who gets to drive, or walk, depending on the day, through Oregon’s western forests on their way to work. These tranquil forests full of towering trees are truly special — and necessary, not only for humans, but for the pileated woodpeckers, cougars, bear, elk and other species who depend on these lands for habitat.

Now the executive director of Conservation Leaders Network (a partner of The Wilderness Society), Peg has spent countless hours advocating for the protection of Oregon’s last ancient forests. Right now, she can walk peacefully through the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) forests of Curry County, enjoying the silence, the views and the wildflowers, the towering trees, swaying gently in the breeze, and the variety of bird calls that echo through the forest.

All of this is in real danger of ending soon. And at stake is much more than a peaceful morning walk.

Clearcutting the forest

Fanned out in a checkerboard pattern along Oregon’s magnificent coast, you will find land where old-growth trees flourish, wildlife is abundant and the salmon spawning rivers are among some of the best in the country. This is the forest that Peg and countless Oregonians enjoy every day.

Yet these wildlands, once protected by the Northwest Forest Plan, are now under threat of becoming clearcut and developed due to a Bush-era plan called the Western Oregon Plan Revisions.

Through a sweetheart deal with the timber industry, WOPR, as the plan is commonly known, will allow nearly twice the current amount of logging on public lands in western Oregon to occur, despite concerns from scientists and federal agencies that these dramatic increases in logging will harm clean water and healthy streams.

Huge old-growth on Roseburg BLM Land. Photo by Francis Eatherington.Conservation groups have repeatedly voiced concerns about this timber plan contributing to global warming, pushing fish and wildlife toward extinction and destroying much of Oregon’s remaining mature and old-growth forests.

Peg is one of many Oregonians who understand why these lands must remain intact. Not only is she a conservationist, but she’s a resident of a coastal area that depends on the clean, cold water that flows through these public forests. Her community economically benefits from the salmon fishery. In fact, many communities in western Oregon depend on federal land watersheds for providing their municipal drinking water. And, like many residents, she is concerned these watersheds could be damaged from the inappropriate logging that is permitted by the Bush-era WOPR plan.

”I’m disappointed that my neighbor, BLM, seems to care more about high logging volumes, than the benefits BLM-forested lands provide all Oregonians,” Peg said. “BLM needs to recognize that there are more values to the forest than board feet and sawdust.”

The fate of over 2.5 million acres of forest, which is home to over 1,000 different wildlife species, now lies in the hands of the Obama Administration. President Obama and Interior Secretary Ken Salazar have pledged to restore scientific integrity and ethical responsibility to public lands management. To live up to their pledge, the administration should act based on science, law and the interests of the American people and withdraw Bush’s WOPR.

It is time to protect some of Oregon’s most treasured forests once and for all.

photos:
Spotted Owl in tree on Roseburg BLM Land. Photo by Francis Eatherington.
Woman next to huge old-growth on Roseburg BLM Land. Photo by Francis Eatherington.

Tags: BLM, clearcutting, Conservation Leaders Network, forest, industry, Northwest Forest Plan, Oregon, timber, Western Oregon Plan Revision, wildlife, WOPR, Stewardship

Comments

Gov

Thank you for your tree hugger link to stop logging here. I used the address and wrote to support logging and free access to the forest. I have always and will continue to support logging. Farming Ranching Hunting Trapping and Logging, are the people that have cared for these forests since America was founded. Mistakes were made but we have learned from those mistakes. I do not know of one single logger that would like to see the spotted owl dissapear, before the tree huggers started threatening them. Loggers and all the above generally love the wildlife and want to protect them as much or more than anyone else. They know whats best for the forest and "the land of no use " polices are not best for anything or anyone.
Most logging including clear cuts are replanted. Much of the logging we enjoy today is being done on trees and in forest that were already replanted by the loggers of the past. Old growth trees should be cut when there expected life is over or nearly over. A certian amount of the new trees should be left to create the old growth trees of tomorrow. The forest grows back just like your lawn. I general only support clear cuts where necessary, due to access, disease, storm damage, fire, ect. .I do support common sence logging , free unrestricted access by the public, and access with equipment for the logging and mining industries with simple reasonable provisions for clean up and reasonable environmental care, and reasonable reduced impact strategy's.