Protect forests in the tropics...and in the United States

December 11, 2009 By David Moulton

David Moulton, Director of Climate Change Policy at The Wilderness Society.Here's a simple question for our climate negotiators in Copenhagen: As we seek to highlight the need to preserve the carbon in the vast but shrinking forests in other countries, how are we doing here at home?

Secretary Salazar addressed Copenhagen on Thursday and noted that U.S. scientists have now calculated that plants and soils in the lower 48 states of the U.S. store almost 90 billion metric tons of carbon or the equivalent of around 50 years of U.S. carbon dioxide emissions at current levels. All together, terrestrial ecosystems in the U.S. are soaking up carbon equivalent to about 30% of U.S. fossil fuel CO2 emissions.

Share the Story

Meanwhile, as the Secretary also acknowledged, we are losing each year the equivalent of the State of Connecticut — 3 million acres — to development.

The 2007 climate conference in Bali took an important step forward with the recognition by all nations of the stake they have in reducing emissions from deforestation and degradation. But if protecting carbon stored in the forest makes sense in the tropics, what of the extensive carbon stores in more temperate nations?

In fact, according to a new report from the Canadian Boreal Initiative, North America contains in its vast boreal forests nearly twice as much carbon per acre as tropical forests. The temperate rainforests of the United States, with plentiful moisture and cool temperatures, tremendous amounts of carbon — 470 metric tons per acre. Our publicly-owned forests in the Pacific Northwest and Southeast Alaska are a virtual Fort Knox of carbon.

Old growth forest in Oregon. Photo by KS Wild.In Copenhagen, the United States is being challenged to lead by example across a range of climate-related strategies, from emissions reductions to natural resources adaptation techniques to clean tech alternatives. The more recent focus on forest policy is now giving Secretary Salazar, Secretary Vilsack and others a reason to develop a new forward-looking forest policy in the United States. Our carbon-rich forests of the United States have always been precious for a host of reasons, but their protection has always been precarious. Now is the time to set an example by protecting our most high-value carbon stores from development and conversion pressures.


This blog also appears on NationalJournal.com Copenhagen Insider.

photo: Old growth forest in Oregon. Photo by KS Wild.

Tags: Carbon, climate, climate change, climate talks, Copenhagen, Forests, Interior Secretary Salazar, Global Warming

Legacy Comments

The protection of forest is a

The protection of forest is a matter which needs to be implemented with utmost speed. Forest cover areas of the U.S and the tropics are decreasing day by day and it is ver important to save them. I think acres and acres of forest coverage are diminishing because of the negligence of the us government. The 2007 climate conference in Bali has led to some positive innovations that prevent deforestation. Forests are the live source of CO2 which is fast diminishing due to air pollution. I think the us must stay awake and solve the problem of deforestation quickly and efficiently. The new Obama administration should take these things into consideration and must make deforestation their main administrative agenda! Planters Wholesale

This has been on going for

This has been on going for decades, and it'll hurt the next generation more than this one. Perhaps, with advancement of technology, forest can be better preserved. One can hope, right? candidiasis oral

Overpopulation!

The loss of forests to development in the U.S. is but a symptom of Overpopulation. Our population grows by more than a hundred thousand a month! Unless and until we focus on reducing our population all of our efforts will be futile in the long run.

Overpopulation

I wholeheartedly agree with this statement and believe strongly that we should be focusing on the problem worldwide. So many difficulties on our planet can be traced to overpopulation. It's a touchy subject for many, and I suspect religious groups around the world might oppose attempts to impact it. The Center for Biological Diversity has recently addressed it formally, and I applaud their doing so. From what I've seen so far, this organization is worth checking out and contributing to. I am extremely impressed with their Executive Director Kieran Suckling. Thank you for making this comment. It comforts me to know that there are others thinking about a subject that has been irking me for many years. I am bewildered that there are so few discussions about it.

If only americans would stop

If only americans would stop living in large houses in suburbs and drivng everywhere. I love the city life and not having a car. rain barrel regards. urban compost tumbler