Time is running out! Join us today to protect Arctic wildlife
March 27, 2009 By Laura Bailey

Ribbon seal. Photo by Kamchatka Burkanov, Courtesy NOAA.
Democracy, sweet democracy. How blessed are we Americans that it doesn’t take a street full of burning tires to get the government’s attention.
So entrenched is our glorious democracy that even the federal government cannot finalize decisions about how to use our lands and our waters without first consulting us citizens. That’s how it works in theory — though I can think of one recent administration, (starts with a ‘B’, ends with an ‘h’) that could have used a little flaming rubber in this regard.
My point is that right now the government’s Minerals Management Service is accepting public comments, as required, about its potential leasing of more Arctic waters off the north coast of Alaska to the oil and gas industry. Ie., it’s time for us to exercise a little democracy.
The Wilderness Society is doing that full-force. Since mid-March we’ve been engaged in a major campaign to stop the leases. This includes mobilizing our many members to put a collective foot down about a decision that could harm Arctic animals and ecosystems.
Our original goal was to get 90,000 member letters to the MMS. But already, as of March 27, our members had sent a resounding 86,191 letters of protest. Oh sweet democracy.
The waters in question (73-million acres in fact) are teeming with wildlife from your friendly Pacific walrus and polar bears to majestic bowhead whales to your pick of seabirds, all of which are already struggling to adapt and survive as climate change wreaks havoc on their world.
Once leasing happens, it will be too late. The machinery, chemicals and noises of industry will move in starting with the seismic booming of exploration which disturbs and displaces sea life from their usual hunting and fishing grounds. The oil spills come down the road, which the MMS says are inevitable. In fact, their own research says there is a 40 percent chance of a major oil spill. And as we know, there is no technology for cleaning up oil spills in icy waters.
The MMS public comment period is only open until March 30. After that, the agency is required to review the comments and address any major issues brought forward. Of course how major issues are ‘addressed’ is up to interpretation, so that’s why it’s critical that our Alaska regional leaders have the resources they need to stay involved.
To keep this campaign strong and running, we need 2,500 new or renewed members to join us by March 30. That support will ensure we have the resources to tackle this urgent issue and protect Arctic animals at risk.
If you’re one of the 831 caring citizens who have hopped aboard this effort, thank you! Your help will make a difference. If you haven’t joined yet, it’s not too late, but we do need to hear from you by March 30.
photos:
Ribbon seal. Photo by Kamchatka Burkanov, Courtesy NOAA.
Bowhead whale. Courtesy NOAA.
Before joining us in 2008, Laura worked as an editor, writer and reporter for a variety of print and online media, including the Gannett-owned Army Times newspapers, Military Times national news Web sites, and the Fort Collins Coloradoan... More about Laura Bailey

Legacy Comments
Sub Arctic Pipeline in Denali National Park
A good subject- how to protect Arctic- and sub arctic wildlife. There is a rumor that Republican operatives are bragging that the Wilderness Society has endorsed building a pipeline through Denali National Park. Since we are so close to April Fools day this might really be a terrible joke- but serious people insist that this is true.
Sen. Murkowski (R.) of Alaska has introduced a bill that would allow a pipeline to be built through Denali National Parks' designated Wilderness Area. Republicans- including Murkowski- are claiming that the Wilderness Society has endorsed this nutty scheme.
If so, who at the Wilderness Society allowed this to happen? In Alaska there already is a North to South pipeline corridor that has had multiple Enivornmental Imapct Statements prepared and approved for the construction of a gasline. This is the same corridor that already contains the Trans- Alaska oil Pipeline System, or TAPS. Why would the Wilderness Society endorse building a pipeline through Denali National Park when there already is a pipeline corridor available that DOES NOT go through protected wilderness?
Please, someone from the Wilderness Society tell us these Republicans are lying, and that the Wilderness Society would never do something so nutty. Alaska has enough problems protecting wilderness areas and their wildlife populations already without this kind of nonsense.